Labour Was Only a Tool for Punishment

“Labour Punish Coalition at Polls”

This was the headline on the BBC News website after the local election results on the 3rd May 2012. The Coalition has indeed suffered great losses but it is no less than anybody would have expected and nothing particularly out of the ordinary. It is quite a standard electoral response in the middle of a negative and destructive term of governance. Some suggest the results are significant, others argue the opposite, and frankly I’m not sure it matters.

What we can be sure about is that the result has very little to do with all the ‘hard work’ that has gone into canvassing and campaigning by politicians. Believing that this has anything to do with the political promises, empty rhetoric and slogans is misguided, and the responses from the main party leaders show them to be inspired by this delusion too (at least outwardly).

This is especially true for Ed Miliband. If he thinks, like the BBC seems to, that this was Labour punishing the Coalition then he needs to come back down to earth. The punishing has not come from Labour, rather it has come generally through Labour (and others) from the electorate. Labour are a tool, apparently the only ‘effective’ tool that this system has to offer. The results mean very little, they change very little and we should be under no pretenses about this. If the shoe was on the other foot then the Conservatives or Lib Dems would be the tool of punishment – this is just what happens.

The most significant statistic is the turnout, which seems to show the true view of the people. Around 68% of the UK electoral chose not to vote. It is vitally important to take that into account. People don’t believe in politics. Not just in politicians. I’m not sure people have ever really had faith in politicians, but rather in the system itself. The general rule of politics is that promises are made, power is gained and promises are broken. We all know this is what happens. During political campaigns we suspend our disbelief and pretend to forget that we know that it’s a culture of broken promises and obfuscation but yesterday’s turnout showed that, people on the whole just couldn’t be bothered to even pretend on this occasion.

The bottom line is there is no victory for Labour; rather it is a damning indictment of politics. No one involved in these elections has political reason to celebrate.

Posted in Independent Thinking, Politics | Tagged , , , , , , | 4 Comments

Identity Labels: How do we use them?


With the recent release of Susan Cain’s ‘Quiet: The Power of Introverts’, there has been a lot of discussion about this often overlooked or unexamined temperament and how it fits in a very extrovert-centred world. It has been great to see, and nice to witness the growing acknowledgement of introversion as an inbuilt and intrinsic personal trait rather than a choice or result of behavioural conditioning.

The more we are encouraged and able to understand ourselves the better. It is important that we recognise that we are not alone, and this is especially true of introversion because it is so conducive to our social interaction and our ability to cope with the world at a most basic level.

There is however a deeper danger that we must be aware of when bestowing labels upon others and ‘self-diagnosing’ ourselves with such tag. They can start to dictate our behaviour and become excuses for self-centred action.

I have noticed this trend on several occasions especially when speaking with people and reading comments on other blogs about introversion. Some people see the identification with this particular temperament label as a license to behave in particular ways (ie justifying their current action) as opposed to freeing them up to understand their self in a new light, thus allowing them to know their limitations and therefore transform and develop as a person.

By transform I don’t mean we deny who we are; rather we can’t develop in any meaningful sense unless we have a grasp on what we are at our roots. Through understanding our deep-seated temperament we understand our choices, our fears and our limits and can work out ways to transcend and push beyond them.

Us and Them

One of the problems with adopting labels is that they can lead to an ‘us’ and ‘them’ mindset. It can turn us into victims and result in us seeing our differences as the fault of ‘the other’ – we can personalise it, rather than seeing it as a way to understand ourselves and we can launch an attack on people who are ‘different’.

This is something I have noticed in the discussion of introversion – a number of times I have seen negative comments and defensive attacks on extroversion, blaming this generalised section of the population for victimising the rest of us. But this is not very helpful and a rather negative outcome of these discussions. It is important to understand the diversity of humanity and recognise this in a positive way rather than defensively.

I am therefore I do

It is tricky because if we are to understand ourselves we need to know what it is we are. Perhaps we must pick up labels, understand ourselves in their light and then let go of them (or hold them lightly) so we can be true to ourselves rather than true to the label.

When we practice the discipline of getting to know ourselves then we don’t need to be told who we are by the abstract generalisation of labels. As humans most of us like being told what to do, or how we are supposed to behave and it is natural for us to seek out categories and identities that we can associate with, but it is also easy for us to become defined by and to define ourselves by these rather than by ourselves. When we do this it is easy to justify selfish behaviour by the label.

For an obvious example of this just think of party politics – members, especially parliamentary members of a party define their views by the views of their party rather than their own judgement. “I am a Conservative therefore I believe this”, or “I am a Lib Dem therefore I believe that”. And so it can be true of linguistically defined natural factors of identity. “I am an introvert, therefore I shall tow the line and behave like an introvert.”

It would be very easy for me to suggest that because I am a self-aware/enlightened introvert I will always leave gatherings early, will never socialise on someone else’s terms and will not step out of my comfort zone because of how uncomfortable it makes me feel.

This can easily become the attitude. But rather than being freed by a self-understanding we become imprisoned by it. Instead of discovering how to cope with placing ourselves into positions of discomfort we hide from them and justify our behaviour with our identity label ironically never really encountering our true self.

Equally, as well as imprisoning ourselves with labels, we can do the same to others. “He is an extrovert, therefore he will not want to do this, or he wont understand the fact that I need to be alone right now”. If that is what we do then labels serve no positive purpose – they should help us understand ourselves so we can better empathise with and understand others.

We can only truly know ourselves through our interactions with others, by spending time in solitude, and by being pushed out of our comfort zones. Our authentic selves are defined and exemplified by our responses rather than our projection of who we want to be. The way we respond to other people, to being alone and to situations in which we are uncomfortable is a true indicator of who we are. This is true whoever we are, whatever label we might bestow on ourselves and whatever sort of person we wish to be. The better we understand ourselves the better we become at being ourselves. Whereas if we let the label dictate our identity, the better we understand the general definition of introversion the better we become at being an introvert. We enter the world of stereotypes. If we understand ourselves in light of labels then we understand ourselves as who we think we should be rather than who we actually are.

We need to embrace our nature but realise that we are not to be defined by it. We have the ability to be who we are but it’s an on going process and certainly not defined by any labels. So lets not use them to justify ourselves, let’s use them to understand ourselves and turn such discoveries into positive catalysts for understanding one another and developing as human beings.

I have focussed specifically on the introvert discussion but this doesn’t exclusively apply here. You might be able to think of other labels that we can commonly allow to dictate our behaviour. If you do think of others then pop them in the comments.

Posted in Independent Thinking | Tagged , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Sheep Dressed Like Wolves: Smells and Memories

This week’s podcast is not just for your ears. For the first time you can watch it too, which is fun. It is all about the way our memories are stimulated by senses and the power of smell in this process.

The question is will you be inviting your friends over for a sniff show after your next holiday?

The musical sounds this week are provided by the following great artists. All available on Bandcamp. Go support them if you like them:

Sam Airy – The Blackout
The Middle East – Hunger
Ivan Moult – What’s in a Word
John Garden – Asylum
The Echelon Effect – Songs from Mosaic

Watch the stream of the podcast here:

Posted in Independent Thinking, Podcast | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

The Biggest Lie Ever Sold: ‘You are Non-Creative’


Sometimes life takes over and you lose yourself in the busyness and momentum that throws you off topic and away from the shoreline. It can be like an oceanic current; upon which you float for a while, until before you know it you are a long way out to sea with no contingency plan for getting back to land.

You don’t know where you are until you look up, and only then do you realise how far you’ve drifted and how long you’ve been oblivious to the fact that you are not where you thought you were. Well we are better at adapting to the water and other such seemingly alien terrain than we might give ourselves credit for. This is life and our main tool for survival is creativity.

All People Are Creative

I dislike it when people divide humans into ‘creatives’ and ‘non-creatives’ – I believe with all my heart that every person on the planet is intrinsically creative and it is a form of tyrannical domination to argue otherwise. It is also a divider that we use right from the word go as we throw the notion of creativity into a very narrow space.

But creativity is in everything and is absolutely integral to our interaction – the very fact that we have language as the basis of our social experience (humanity) means creativity is at the heart of everything we do.

As a result of this I believe that our creativity must be nurtured, encouraged and given space to breathe and it is as important for our emotional wellbeing as food and shelter are for our physical wellbeing. This is not a recipe for good obedient purveyors of the status quo however and is unlikely to be the mainstay of the established order, so it is no surprise that we are led to believe in a world where some of us are ‘not creative’.

We all have our soul-enhancing/restorative pursuits though and the best of these are creative. For me writing and music are huge providers of this and are my common and reliable sources of restoration. But there are many things that do the same job; walking, chatting, exercise, cooking, playing with my nephews, thinking etc. These are all creative pursuits.

Creativity is a culture, it’s a choice and it is something that requires discipline and training, but it is NOT a preserve for a few people, it is the natural condition of all of us. Creativity is also by nature outward looking – it cannot help but breathe life into and inspire other people. It is freedom: Freedom FROM a prescribed blueprint/map and freedom TO mix ourselves with the world.

A CONVERSATION
For example a conversation that goes behind niceties and trivial observations. If you say more than the usual then you are being creative.

READING
When you read you are being highly creative. You are working with the author to construct a whole reality in your mind. It is an intimate encounter where two worlds really do collide and make sweet creative love. This is the difference between reading a book and watching TV. Nothing creative happens in the viewer when they watch TV.

COOKING
Nothing beats a good meal that takes time, effort and even a spot of collaboration. There is not much creative about takeaway and ready meals.

HOW YOU SPEND YOUR TIME
You have one major choice: how you spend your time. You actually have that choice. That is a choice of creativity. You decide. You paint your world, you have control over what you do and the way you approach it. That’s the reality that underpins your life but it probably doesn’t feel like the truth.

Well here’s the actual truth – you don’t have to consume the things you’re told to consume, you don’t have to do the activities you’re told to do, you don’t have to conform to stereotypes and you don’t have to buy the magazines that vacuously declare what people ‘like you’ are supposed to do with their time. You have complete creative freedom. You need to remind yourself of this every day because there are many people who want, nay need you to believe the opposite.

There is a common theme. When we live in a world where our collective priority is making money, manipulating other people, being ‘efficient’ and consuming we smash the intrinsic priority of humanity (creating) to the bottom of the pile and condition in ourselves a belief that creativity is unnecessary for anyone other than ‘artists’.

But when we are given the space we are all creative. Check out this wall that Candy Chang turned into a board for people’s dreams. She left open a load of space with the words ‘Before I Die I Want to…’ and people were left to fill in the gaps. This is a space for wild dreams, for un-inhibited imagination and creative thought that goes beyond our everyday mundane slog. And whats more, everybody is able to engage with it.

So, are you with me now? There are no non-creatives. Only those who acknowledge their creative spirit and those that have been fed the lie that they don’t have one. If you’re the latter then today feel that veil lifted.

You ARE creative and you’re ALIVE – now go and do the remarkable things that makes you feel it. Cook a meal, ride a bike for the hell of it, talk to a stranger, actively read a poem, actively listen to a song (don’t just consume it), volunteer, go somewhere you’ve never been before, engage with the news, be critical, ask questions, don’t conform to the stereotypes of who you think you are, go skinny dipping, try something new, do the thing that only you can think of because I’ve run out of ideas now. Do something that DOESN’T give you a monetary reward, just for shits and giggles. That’s creativity.

BUT: When you start thinking about how much money you can make from it then it turns from creativity into destructivity, and that’s the very reason there are people who don’t believe they are creative right now. Creativity has nothing to do with money.

So next time you hear someone talking about creatives vs non-creatives, ask them what they mean, and tell them that they either need to choose different terminology or that they are simply off the mark.

Posted in Independent Thinking, Life-Changing, Observation | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Sheep Dressed Like Wolves: Words are Powerful and You are Creative

This is the eighth episode of 2012. Where do our words go once they leave our mouths? Are there really creative and non-creative people? These are two of the questions tackled in this week’s episode of Sheep Dressed Like Wolves.

Music is provided by the following great artists:

Slow Dancing Society – …And to the Dust We Shall Return
The American Dollar – Signaling through the Flames
Small Literature – This is Dedicated to You
The Echelon Effect – Debris
The The American Dollar – We’re Hitting Everything

Posted in Independent Thinking | Leave a comment

Sheep Dressed Like Wolves: Panic Buying

The seventh episode of the podcast sees Andy look at the recent ‘fuel crisis’ .  Why did we behave like we did, why the government wants us to blow ourselves up and the ultimate mystery, why is everyone else an idiot part from you?

Music is provided by the following great artists:

DJ Sakir – Who Needs Forever (Thievery Corporation Mix)
Chris Tye – Forever for the Better
Sinkane – Runnin’
Hope and Social – Pitchin
Kinack – Tracks from Ondas

Posted in Independent Thinking, Podcast | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Panic Buying is Not Human Nature


There has been a lot of talk recently surrounding the weird run on the petrol stations that we have witnessed in the light of the non-announced strike by the tanker drivers union, Unite. People have been attempting to explain the psychology and economics of how it happened and why there was a spiral of fuel consumption in response to something that wasn’t even real.

I have heard people referring to Game Theory and the Prisoners Dilemma as helping us to understand the underlying self-interest that is intrinsic within human nature. But I don’t think the Prisoner’s Dilemma is actually very applicable in this situation because we are not talking about a zero-sum decision made by two individuals. Rather it is a collective behaviour that on the whole people are unaware of due to the fact that many of us deny our responsibility and the fact that our actions are out of the ordinary.

With the prisoners dilemma you make a decision without the knowledge of what the other person will do – you have to second guess the behaviour of the other only knowing the OPTIONS available to you (and them). Whereas this panic buying of petrol has happened precisely because we can see the behaviour of others and because at the end of the day whether we like it or not petrol is part and parcel of the way we live. Because the behaviour has been so visible it has been perpetuated by its own existence.

There are very few people who will admit to panic buying – on the whole people who have been filling up with petrol have been doing so because they need to. It wouldn’t surprise me if there was a slight levelling out over the course of a few days and that the week in general wouldn’t look massively different to an average week of fuel purchasing (just with the majority focussed on 2 or 3 days). I might be very wrong about that, but every person I have spoken to that filled up in the past few days did so because they needed to this week anyway. Obviously there are a few filling up needlessly and I’m sure people are generally trying to justify themselves, but I imagine that this will level out over the course of a month or so.

It can be problematic to start speculating about human nature and arguing that an innate self-interest is what provokes our action. We witness not human nature, but rather human behaviour, which is the result of the nature of society NOT the nature of the individual itself. The only real conclusion we can make about human nature is that there isn’t such a thing, that our perception of it is socially constructed. We have crafted a society where for most people fuel is an intrinsically vital part of what we need and it is up to us to use ‘our’ money (a socio-economic construct) in order to buy it so that we can do what is expected of us. Everyone buys petrol because everyone buys petrol. We are like sheep and most of our actions are based on this foundation. This is not the universal behaviour of humans, but it IS the behaviour of humans in our capitalist society, and one wouldn’t expect anything different. It is the basis of our ideology.

Behaviour vs. Nature

The advert for the latest Gillette razor provides a perfect nano insight into how human behaviour can be conditioned. It is a razor that allows you to shave ‘against the grain’ rather than with the grain, without doing any damage to your face. Now, on the surface this sounds like a useful feature because it makes shaving easier, safer and potentially less painful. What it also does, however is negates the need to learn how to shave properly in accordance with the natural contours of the face and the direction of hair. In using the product, while we have it our lives are apparently made easier and we learn to forget the knowledge and skill involved with shaving properly. We become reliant on it without realising. It doesn’t actually improve our lives particularly. We were able to shave perfectly effectively before, but it chips away at our previous knowledge and conditioned so we can’t do without it.

In much the same way, we allow our behaviour to be dictated by our behaviour. Our knowledge of who we are, is limited to the way that we behave, and that is precisely what the few people trying to maintain their power desire of us. Our lives are simplified so that we forget how to help each other survive – we concentrate instead on how making our own existence as comfortable as possible. It is not therefore a desire to survive that drives us but a desire to not be inconvenienced, a need to remain comfortable and to maintain the status quo of our lives. When we are backed into the corner the only thing we know how to do is to attempt to consume our way out of it. And the further we go the harder it is to turn back.

So, rather than being the result of human nature, the behaviour we have witnessed is the result of itself. Behaviour stems from behaviour. We conform to our perception of reality. The danger is we will start to believe the lies that we are told about the selfishness and calculated self-interest behind our decisions – if we do this we become this. It is the self-fulfilling prophesy. Much like the very post-modern aspect of the panic buying itself – we feared a strike that would lead to a fuel shortage so we bought petrol as if it had already happened just in case, and the very result that we feared happened because of the behaviour that stemmed from the fear despite the fact that the very stimulus we feared that would lead to the problem never even happened. The desired effect of the strike occurred without a strike even needing to take place. It is a quite profound phenomenon.

There are no simple explanations for this but under no circumstances should it be written off as simply the selfish behaviour of innately self-interested people with self-centred human nature.

Posted in Advertising, Independent Thinking, Politics | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

You Don’t HAVE to Do it, You GET to Do it

When the sun comes out everything changes – the world seems somehow lighter. This week spring has really come through; blossom like snow upon the grass, birds singing loudly and the whirring of lawn mowers rattling into action for the first time this year. There’s a real sense of waking life and excitement as memories of what summer feels like is stirred within us. The streets around where I live have been filled with kids playing games of cricket, football, and cycling about on their tiny little bikes. It’s as if all of a sudden the drudgery of life has been smashed by a conscious interconnectedness and dare I say enjoyment of human interaction.

I spend quite a lot of time in my car, driving around for work, driving to gigs and then my favourite, driving to Durham (and back). The great thing about driving is it gives you the choice to either sit in silence, to talk to yourself, or to listen to something. In driving the three and a half hour journey to Durham I have time to do all three.

Last time I was going up I listened to Michael Hyatt’s podcast and was really caught by one of the points he made about the relationship between vision and the action around it (I think it was that episode anyway – he definitely said it at some point…)

He suggested replacing the word ‘have’ with the word ‘get’.

We spend so much of our lives moaning about all the things we ‘have’ to do. So we just plough on and get them done so that they’re over with. But it’s really easy to get so caught up in this mindset that we approach everything we do under its cloak. It is the perpetual future perspective, whereby we are in a constant battle to get everything we ‘have to do’ done so we can move on to the next task. This never ends and so we never enjoy these things.

However, what if we flip it to things we ‘get to do’? Then we might be able to appreciate what we do and our unique situation in which we are able to do them. What’s the point in life if everything we do is something we begrudgingly ‘HAVE to do’?

Have we led our entire life without making any decisions bringing us to this point?

Are we working thankless tasks because someone or something else has just plonked us into this situation without our say?

No, our lives are a fusion mix of OUR decisions and chanced circumstance.

Rather than, ‘I have to go to work’, how different does ‘I get to go to work’ sound? Or rather than ‘I have to pick the kids up from school’, ‘I get to pick the kids up from school’. That one word changes everything.

There are many people who would love the chance to do these things. And more often than not if we lose the opportunity for the things we currently do then we will thoroughly lament their passing.

Always Someone Worse Off
It’s a different mindset to that of simply saying ‘chin up, there’s always someone worse off than you, be grateful’. Too often we attempt to use this on one another in an effort to force gratitude into a situation where such words are inappropriate. But this is an effort toward injecting gratitude from a negative place. At the end of the day there is someone in a (subjectively) worse off position than everyone in the world, apart from ONE person out of the seven billion of us.

Saying ‘Urgh, I have to go to work but I guess I should be grateful that I’ve got a job’ is not going to lead to gratitude, and it’s certainly not going to inspire you to make the world a better place for the people around you. It turns you introspective and self-centred because it tells you to hold on to what you have as tightly as possible because it could easily be gone and you could end up just like the people who don’t have what you have.

Whereas saying ‘I get to go to work’ allows you to be both grateful for your situation and also to hold it lightly. It somehow opens up and looks out. It’s not about the job, it’s about your attitude. It is the attitude of an enthusiastic leader rather than a reluctant follower. Rather than attempting to drag others down, as is the way with ‘there is always someone worse off’, it sets a foundation for pulling other people up.

How often is it that those people who moan about ‘having to go to work’ are the same people who will be there in 5, 10, 20 years time, still moaning?

The phrase ‘have to’ allows us to think of ourselves as victims, whereas the term ‘get to’ fills our outlook with opportunity and the reality that we can choose our perspective.

We all get to do loads of stuff. What are you doing today that you woke up this morning and thought ‘I have to do…’? What happens if you change the word ‘have’ with the word ‘get’? Does it change the way you approach the task, and your interaction with the other people involved?

Posted in Independent Thinking, Inspiration, Observation | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Empire of the Soul – Photos

Our lives are comprised of stories; they ARE our lives. They are the constructive constituents of our very reality.

We all have stories and we all listen to the stories that we are told.

They spread through generations until we accept them as truth. Some stories are toxic. They control our behaviour and neighbourly relations through the fear provoked by their apparent infallibility.

The pernicious and unquestioned story of our own individual world is an empire, it allows our actions to be dictated by a set of instilled assumptions brought about by the experiences of our ancestors, of whom we have very distorted images of perfection and strength. We can recognise these stories by the things they make us do.
 
These stories of empire turn us into hypocrites, into subservient slaves and into prisoners of the very stories we tell ourselves about ourselves. This is the uniqueness of humanity; that our realities are constructed, not by events but by the stories we tell ourselves about events, happenings, and the stories of catastrophic future events if we do not behave in certain pre-set ways today.


At a most basic level we have a human instinct to preserve the status quo, to keep things as they are, acknowledging our immediate environment and only imminent and visible dangers. Whatever our present reality, even if it is detrimental to our own wellbeing, our instinct is to keep it that way. It is the difference between responsibility and blame.


When we don’t take responsibility we like to blame others for the actions of our own lives, and we allow ourselves to become the thing we dislike about the people we blame for these very things we don’t want to be. Through blame we change nothing for the better, we just drag people down and attempt to destroy their spirit. Through responsibility we move forwards. We can take responsibility for changing things we were not to blame for – we must, for if we don’t take responsibility for turning the machine around we are complicit in mega crimes against the future and are fully to blame anyway. Our children will hold us culpable as much for the monstrous inactions we are currently committing as much as the monstrous actions themselves. Ignorance is not an option.

The Parable of the Tribes
Ideas spread like the tribes. Individual worlds (like tribes) live within reach of one another. If all choose the way of peace, then all may live in peace. But what if all but one tribe chooses peace, and that one is ambitious for expansion and conquest? What might happen to the others when confronted by this neighbour?

Perhaps one tribe is attacked and defeated, its people destroyed and its lands seized for the use of the victors. The land becomes run beneath the dominant ideology (arrogance, underpinned by expansion and conquest – not peace).

There is another tribe, which is defeated. However it is not made extinct. Rather, it is subjugated and transformed to serve the conqueror. The land becomes run beneath the dominant ideology (arrogance, underpinned by expansion and conquest – not peace).

A third tribe doesn’t want to face disaster, so it flees from the area into some undesirable place, and its former land becomes possessed by the dominant tribe with no effort required. The land becomes run beneath the dominant ideology (arrogance, underpinned by expansion and conquest – not peace).

Let us suppose that another tribe has seen what is going on and wants to defend its land so the people can preserve themselves and their autonomy. They get weapons and develop successful defences against the dominant tribe.

However, in defending in such a way, this tribe has become just like those from whom they are trying to protect their land. Therefore the land becomes run beneath the dominant ideology and the citizens become complicit in this idea. The tribe has had to assimilate with the aggressive ideology and so the idea has spread anyway.

These are decisions we make every day. But we can find another way outside of these options. We don’t have to remain inside the paradigm of force in which we presently reside.

We can transcend violence; in fact we HAVE to transcend violence, both objective and subjective (unconscious/accepted and recognised/acknowledged).

We must use our collective imagination, to stand up to the violence that we subject others and ourselves to. We have to recognise the ways in which we hold an unconscious imperial control over one another and break these systems through non-violent activism.

Add your photo to the collection. Order the mask here and then email a picture of you wearing it.

Posted in Ideas, Independent Thinking, Release | Leave a comment

Sheep Dressed Like Wolves: Cups and Saucers

This is the sixth episode of Sheep Dressed Like Wolves, during which Andy discusses cups and saucers, suggesting that it might be time to find something to replace the now outdated and impractical use of saucers. He also points to what he sees as a dangeroud trend toward the provision of saucers with mugs in modern times. Surely there can be another way?

Music is provided by the following great artists:

Toy Soldiers – Tell the Teller
Sufjan Stevens – Too Much
Micah Josiah – Dyin’

Rhian Sheehan – Music from Seven Tales of the North Wind

Posted in Independent Thinking, Music, Podcast | Leave a comment